CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

obsidian

Obsidian vault: search/read/write notes, backlinks, Bases, Canvas.

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise, highly actionable, and well-organized into clear sections with copy-paste-ready commands, but the write/batch workflows lack an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop, capping workflow clarity. Adding sequenced validation checkpoints would raise the lowest dimension.

Suggestions

Turn the write workflow's verification into an explicit feedback loop: after `obsidian create`/`move` or `apply_patch`, state 'then verify with `obsidian read`/diff; if broken, fix and re-verify'.

Add a short validation checkpoint in the Bases/Canvas JSON editing flow (e.g. parse-check after each edit) to make the batch/structured-data verification a sequenced step rather than a safety aside.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (only one terse defining line, tight copy-paste command blocks, no padding or explanation of basic concepts), matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than the level-2 'could be tightened'.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable, specific commands with exact flags (e.g. `obsidian search query="OpenClaw" format=json`, `obsidian create path="Notes/New.md" content=...`, `obsidian move path=... to=...`) plus filesystem `sed`/`rg` and `apply_patch` examples that are copy-paste ready, matching the level-3 anchor and not the pseudocode level-2.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Workflows are clearly sectioned (First Checks, Read, Write, Bases/Canvas, Safety) with a sequenced CLI-disabled flow, but for destructive/batch write operations the validation steps ('review diffs', 'validate JSON after edits') are stated as safety rules rather than an explicit validate->fix->retry checkpoint sequence, which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single file is well-organized into clearly navigable sections (Sources, First Checks, Read/Write Workflows, Bases/Canvas/Plugins, Safety) with no nested references or wall-of-text, fitting the well-organized/self-contained level-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive, with strong natural trigger terms for the Obsidian domain, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause so its completeness is capped. Adding a trigger clause would raise the weakest dimension.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when working with an Obsidian vault, notes, backlinks, Bases, or Canvas files.' to satisfy the 'when' half of completeness.

Expand trigger variations users might say (e.g. 'wiki links', 'daily notes', 'Obsidian markdown') to further strengthen trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions and features ("search/read/write notes, backlinks, Bases, Canvas"), naming the Obsidian domain and five distinct capabilities, matching the 'Lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' but has no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit 'when to use' guidance; per the rubric a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 2, so it is not the level-3 anchor and not the weak level-1.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural Obsidian-domain terms a user would say ("Obsidian vault", "notes", "backlinks", "Bases", "Canvas", "search/read/write") are well covered, matching the good-coverage anchor rather than the 'missing common variations' level 2.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Obsidian vault" plus app-specific features ("Bases", "Canvas") carve a clear, distinctive niche that is unlikely to overlap with other skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor above the level-2 'could overlap' example.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
steipete/agent-scripts
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.