Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-structured, with concrete commands, templates, and explicit verification steps for batch sheet operations; it is held just below top marks by implicit error-recovery loops and time-sensitive parameters embedded in commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and low-padding: bullet heuristics, exact gog commands, a file template, and sheet headers with no concept explanations Claude already knows; the only mild drag is time-sensitive date parameters (e.g. 'after:2026-01-01', the 2026 calendar range) embedded directly in commands rather than flagged, which keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready across the common cases: concrete `gog` command snippets with exact syntax and sheet ranges, a per-opportunity markdown template, exact sheet headers, and a `NNN-slug.md` naming convention. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced ('When adding an opportunity' 1-5, 'Before changing status' 1-5) and batch sheet writes include a validation checkpoint ('After writing, re-read the range and verify row count'), but the error-recovery loop (what to do when verification fails) is implicit rather than an explicit fix-and-retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-sectioned file (Sources, Scope, Evaluation, Verification, Repo Notes, Sheet Sync) with no nested bundle references; the only referenced paths are external user-project data files rather than skill documentation, so structure is good but there is no actual one-level-deep reference split to push it to a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |