CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wrangler

Wrangler CLI: Workers, KV, tail, deploy, account routing.

68

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary terse operator skill: concrete commands, exact pitfall values, real validation checkpoints around account-sensitive operations, and clean section structure with no padding. The only gap is the absence of an explicit post-deploy verification step in the deploy workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean, imperative bullets with zero padding — no explanation of what Wrangler or Workers are, just defaults, pitfalls, commands, and an account-check rule. Every line carries non-obvious operational knowledge, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Actionability

Quick Commands gives copy-paste-ready invocations with exact flags (--format json, --sampling-rate 0.999), pitfalls state exact values and workarounds (no --limit, use --prefix; sampling must be <1), and defaults point to concrete sources (wrangler --help, node_modules/wrangler/config-schema.json). Matches anchor 5 — the <worker>/<id> slots are standard argument placeholders, not pseudocode.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Checkpoints are present for the risky operations — 'wrangler whoami before account-sensitive work' and 'read wrangler.toml/wrangler.json(c) before commands... stop and ask' on account mismatch — matching anchor 4 (clear sequence, most checkpoints). Not 5 because there is no post-deploy verification or explicit validate-fix-retry loop, and no numbered sequencing for multi-step operations.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A sub-50-line, self-contained skill with no external bundle files; the body is split into four clearly labeled, well-organized sections (Defaults, Pitfalls, Quick Commands, Account Check). Per the rubric guideline this scores 5 on well-organized sections alone.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A terse, distinctive description that names the tool and its concrete capability areas, but it omits any 'Use when...' trigger clause and the natural keyword 'Cloudflare'. The what is clear; the when is entirely implicit, which is the main weakness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g.: 'Use when the user mentions Wrangler, Cloudflare Workers, KV, R2, D1, or deploying/tailing Workers.'

Include 'Cloudflare' in the description — users naturally phrase this work as 'Cloudflare Workers' or 'deploy to Cloudflare'.

Convert the noun list into concrete actions ('Deploy Workers, manage KV/R2/D1/Queues, tail production traffic, route deploys between accounts') to lift specificity from 4 toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Workers, KV, tail, deploy, account routing" names the domain plus several concrete capabilities, matching anchor 4 ('lists several specific actions; minor gaps'). It falls short of 5 because the list is terse nouns rather than comprehensive verb-form actions, and above 3 because more than 1-2 capabilities are named.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (Wrangler CLI covering Workers, KV, tail, deploy, account routing) but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. It is above 2 because both a clear 'what' and a distinct tool identity are present.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Terms 'Wrangler', 'Workers', 'KV', 'tail', 'deploy' are exactly what users say for this work, matching anchor 4 (good coverage). Not 5 because the natural term 'Cloudflare' is absent, as are R2/D1/secrets which the body covers.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Wrangler CLI' names a specific niche tool with distinct triggers (Workers, KV, tail, deploy), so conflict risk with other skills is minimal — anchor 5. It is not 4 because Wrangler work would not plausibly route to a different skill.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
steipete/agent-scripts
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.