Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear interview-then-assemble workflow and no unnecessary external references. Minor gains are possible in conciseness and a touch more concrete templating.
Suggestions
Trim the explanatory rationale in the Subagent considerations block to the bare decision criteria.
Consider adding a compact completed SKILL.md example to push actionability toward fully copy-paste-ready.
Add a brief completion checklist restating the final steps (save, verify path, present link) to strengthen workflow checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Instruction-dense and lean with only minor over-explanation (the Subagent considerations rationale), fitting the score-4 anchor of efficient content with trimmable excess. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: exact file path, a precise section template, and explicit questions to ask; absence of code is appropriate for an instruction-only skill and not penalized. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence with an implicit multi-round questioning loop; explicit validation checkpoints are not applicable to an interactive interview, so no destructive/batch cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are needed; the content is self-contained and well-organized with numbered steps and a subsection, just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold for a full 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |