Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured, highly actionable, and token-efficient, providing a concrete issue catalogue and output template with self-check rules; its only gaps are minor tightening opportunities and the absence of an explicit validation loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (it never explains what a git diff or off-by-one error is); a few bullet descriptions and 'Questions to ask' lists could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete git commands, an enumerated catalogue of specific issue types, and a copy-paste-ready output template with a worked example give fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (Inputs -> Obtain Diff -> Issues -> Output -> Completion) with self-check rules ('consider whether intentional', 'check if already checked earlier') serves as validation, though there is no explicit validate-and-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections and is appropriately self-contained with no nested references; at ~180 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception that would allow a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |