reviewing a git diff for small localized coding mistakes that can be fixed without high-level understanding
68
55%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
86%
1.26xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/low-level-code-review/SKILL.mdOutput format + ACID disk violations
Issues grouped by file
100%
100%
Line numbers cited
100%
100%
Original code quoted
100%
100%
Concrete fix provided
100%
100%
One-sentence explanation
100%
100%
Missing fsync before rename
0%
100%
Missing directory fsync
0%
100%
Raw pointer flagged
20%
100%
West const flagged
0%
100%
Runtime errors prioritized
80%
100%
No compiler-caught issues
80%
100%
ACID memory violations + RAII guards
updateBalance missing lock
100%
100%
batchUpdate not atomic
0%
100%
batchUpdate missing lock
100%
87%
evict dirty-count bug
100%
100%
Manual lock/unlock flagged
100%
100%
flushAll exception safety
100%
100%
getDirtyAccounts missing lock
100%
87%
Raw mutex pointer unnecessary
50%
37%
Line numbers cited
100%
100%
Concrete fixes provided
100%
100%
Focuses on added lines only
100%
100%
Large diff deduplication + null-deref
Null dereference in sendMessage
100%
100%
Null dereference in sendMessageWithRetry
100%
100%
Runtime errors before style
100%
100%
West const deduplicated
0%
0%
West const flagged at least once
0%
0%
Large diff split suggestion
0%
0%
Line numbers cited
100%
100%
Original code quoted
100%
100%
Concrete fix provided
100%
100%
No compiler-caught issues
33%
100%
1b0eccd
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.