Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands and worked examples, but loses points for repeated agent-use guidance, missing explicit output-validation checkpoints in the orchestration loop, and un-signaled reference bundle files.
Suggestions
Link to the per-agent reference files inline (e.g., add a 'See [explore.md](references/explore.md)' column or note in the Agent Selection table) so the bundle is clearly signaled rather than implicit.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow, such as 'review the implementation agent's output for acceptance-criteria satisfaction before declaring the task complete'.
De-duplicate agent-use guidance: consolidate the Routing Signals table, Common Recipes, and Agent Selection table so each agent's usage is stated once.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but agent-use guidance is restated across the routing table, common recipes, examples, and the agent-selection table, and the 'Forbidden Behaviors' section repeats the hard constraints; not score 3 due to this redundancy. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete copy-pasteable invocation command with full heredoc template and four worked examples including acceptance criteria, plus explicit agent-selection and recipe tables; fully actionable for an instruction/routing skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences multi-step orchestration with numbered steps and parallelization notes, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints confirming agent output before proceeding; per the rubric, missing verification in workflows that delegate destructive code changes caps this at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Six one-level-deep reference files (develop.md, explore.md, oracle.md, librarian.md, frontend-ui-ux-engineer.md, document-writer.md) exist in the bundle, but the body never explicitly links to or signals them inline, keeping navigation implicit rather than clearly signaled; not score 1 because structure exists and is one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |