Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and built-in validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is moderate redundancy in the goal/now and field-name warnings, which slightly hurts token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated goal/now and "do not use alternative field names" warnings into one authoritative callout to trim redundant tokens.
Tighten the closing "Additional Notes" into concise imperatives, e.g. 'Include more detail when needed; prefer file:line references over large code blocks.'
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after mark_handoff (e.g., confirm the returned outcome matches the intended status) to fully close the database-write feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete templates and commands, but repeats the goal/now requirement and "do not use alternative field names" warning across the intro, template comments, and field guide, plus some soft guidance ("more information, not less") that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete bash fallback chain, an exact YAML template, named MCP tools with parameters, and explicit placeholder-substitution instructions, which is mostly executable with only minor templated-field gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with outcome-determination logic and a checkpoint for the blockers case, plus a guard against the stale "latest handoff" default; minor validation gaps remain in the MCP write flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file (no bundle directories present) with clear numbered section headers and a field guide; well-organized with no nested references, fitting the strong simple-skill structure anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |