Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, well-sequenced intake workflow with executable gh commands, explicit approval/validation checkpoints, and an error-recovery loop. Only minor tightening would push conciseness to the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean procedural body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; a few sentences ('A trusted upstream file can be fetched without cloning the whole repository.') could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands — 'gh issue create', 'gh issue comment' with '--title', '--label bug/enhancement/documentation/chore' and exact title prefixes — covering the common create/comment cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with per-step completion criteria, an explicit human-approval checkpoint before posting ('Ask, then post once'), and an error-recovery loop ('If the command reports an uncertain outcome, check whether the issue or comment already exists before retrying'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained SKILL.md under 50 lines with no external references needed, organized into five well-labeled numbered sections — meeting the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |