github.com/stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server
| Skill | Added | Review |
|---|---|---|
triage-reviews .agents/skills/triage-reviews/SKILL.md Fetch PR review comments, verify each against real code/docs, fix valid issues, commit and push | 66 66 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Low Low-risk findings worth noting Version: 0cd1e5f | |
btca-local .agents/skills/btca-local/SKILL.md Invoke this skill when the user says "use btca" | 38 38 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby High Do not use without reviewing Version: 0cd1e5f | |
3-verify-pr-fix .agents/skills/3-verify-pr-fix/SKILL.md Check out a candidate PR locally, restart the MCP server on the PR branch, re-run the exact same MCP tool call that failed in /2-repro-issue, diff the outputs, and audit the fix for locale-independence, DOM-stability, and scope per CLAUDE.md scraping rules. Use when the user says "verify PR | 75 75 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby High Do not use without reviewing Version: 0cd1e5f | |
2-repro-issue .agents/skills/2-repro-issue/SKILL.md Reproduce a single LinkedIn-MCP issue locally on the current branch against the real authenticated LinkedIn session at ~/.linkedin-mcp/profile/, using the MCP streamable-http server. Captures the exact failure mode (tool output, error, missing data) and maps it back to the scraper code path. Use when the user says "reproduce | 76 76 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Passed No findings from the security scan Version: 0cd1e5f | |
1-triage-issues .agents/skills/1-triage-issues/SKILL.md Scan all open issues and PRs in stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server and rank them by urgency (severity, user impact, age, references), implementation quality (for PRs — mergeability, CI, diff scope, locale-independence, test coverage), and contributor track record (prior merged PRs, review quality, response cadence). Use when the user asks "what should I tackle first as core maintainer", "which PRs are production-ready", "triage backlog", "scan open issues", or any maintainer-prioritisation question about this repo. Outputs a ranked list with rationale per item, not a fix. | 75 75 Impact — No eval scenarios have been run Securityby Low Low-risk findings worth noting Version: 0cd1e5f |