Fetch PR review comments, verify each against real code/docs, fix valid issues, commit and push
64
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/triage-reviews/SKILL.mdFetch all review comments on the current PR, verify each finding against real code, fix valid issues, and push.
Determine the PR number:
$ARGUMENTS if providedgh pr view --json number --jq .numberFetch ALL comments (reviewers post in multiple places):
gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/reviews
gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments
gh api --paginate repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr}/commentsExtract unique findings — deduplicate across Copilot, Greptile, and human reviewers. Group by file and line.
For EVERY finding, verify against real code before accepting or rejecting:
btca resources to see what's available, then btca ask -r <resource> -q "..." for library/framework questionsgit add only changed files, git commit with message:
fix: Address PR review feedback
- <one-line summary per fix>gt submit (or git push if not using Graphite)Pushing the fix isn't enough. Each inline review comment lives in its own thread that GitHub keeps showing as "Unresolved" until someone explicitly resolves it. The skill must close that loop for every Valid and False-positive finding so the PR view actually reflects what was triaged.
Workflow per finding:
Reply on the thread with the verdict and evidence:
Fixed in <short-sha>. <one-line what changed>.Valid, deferred to follow-up. Reason: <why>.False positive. <one-line evidence: file:line shows X, or doc link Y>.Resolve the thread only when the finding is Fixed or False positive. Valid + unfixed threads must stay open so the PR view continues to surface the real bug. Resolving them would let the PR look ready while the bug is still in the code. Leave the maintainer to close those threads when they file the follow-up.
GitHub's review threads can only be resolved via GraphQL (REST has no endpoint). The thread ID is a GraphQL node ID, not the REST comment ID, so fetch both together. Use --paginate so PRs with more than 100 threads are covered, the page size cap is per-request not total:
PR=<pr-number>
OWNER=<owner>
REPO=<repo>
gh api graphql --paginate -f query='
query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
pullRequest(number: $pr) {
reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $endCursor) {
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) { nodes { databaseId path line body } }
}
}
}
}
}' \
-F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr=$PR \
--jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false) | {threadId: .id, commentId: .comments.nodes[0].databaseId, path: .comments.nodes[0].path, line: .comments.nodes[0].line}' \
> /tmp/triage-threads-$PR.jsonEach entry now has {threadId, commentId, path, line}. Match it against your Phase-2 finding map (by path + line or commentId). For each match:
# Post reply (REST endpoint for replies on a specific review comment)
gh api -X POST "/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR/comments/$COMMENT_ID/replies" \
-f body="Fixed in $SHORT_SHA. <one-line>."
# Resolve the thread (GraphQL) — Fixed and False-positive only. SKIP for Valid+unfixed.
gh api graphql -f query="
mutation {
resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: \"$THREAD_ID\"}) {
thread { isResolved }
}
}"If the parent review left a separate top-level summary comment (Greptile's Greptile Summary issue-level comment, for example), leave it alone, only inline review threads need resolving.
Cap: resolve only threads tied to findings you actually classified. Do not bulk-resolve unrelated threads (other reviewers, human discussion, follow-up questions that aren't from this triage round).
Present a final summary table of ALL findings with verdicts:
| # | Source | File:Line | Finding | Verdict | Reason | Thread |
|---|
Last column: replied + resolved, replied + still open (e.g. waiting on reviewer), or n/a (no inline thread, only summary). If any thread stayed open, name it explicitly so the next pass picks it up.
6d36970
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.