Reproduce #N, investigate #N, try #N locally, or verify the bug in #N.
60
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/2-repro-issue/SKILL.mdEvaluate the reporter packet and the matching source. A live LinkedIn call is optional. Do not check out a PR or attempt a fix. That is /3-verify-pr-fix.
NUM=$(echo "$ARGUMENTS" | sed -E 's|.*/||; s|#||g' | grep -oE '^[0-9]+' | head -1)
[ -z "$NUM" ] && { echo "Invalid input: '$ARGUMENTS'. Pass an issue number or URL." >&2; exit 1; }
REPO=stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server
gh issue view $NUM --repo $REPO --commentsFrom the thread extract the tool, arguments, observed result, runtime, LinkedIn variant, and related issues. Distinguish observations, source findings, hypotheses, and work not run.
Map the tool to code:
linkedin_mcp_server/tools/<surface>.py. MCP entrypoint and arg validationdocs/scraping-architecture.md. Generated ownership table; follow it to linkedin_mcp_server/scraping/<owner>.py rather than treating scraping/extractor.py as the implementationlinkedin_mcp_server/scraping/fields.py. PERSON_SECTIONS / COMPANY_SECTIONS (each entry = one navigation)tests/scraping/test_<owner>.py; use tests/test_fields.py, tests/test_identifiers.py, and tests/test_link_metadata.py for those owners, and tests/scraping/test_facade_*.py only for facade contractsInspect the relevant source at the current SHA. Do not invent a LinkedIn result or an unimplemented tool call.
This step is complete when the report names the issue, the code SHA, the inspected evidence, the facts established, the unverified runtime claims, and the next decision.
Use one of:
A successful call on the maintainer's different account never refutes a failure on the reporter's account. Target content language is not the authenticated account's UI language. Captures and URL or attribute evidence may establish the needed variation without another live call.
Review reporter commands before execution. Publishing permission does not authorize send_message, a connection request, a forced login, or repeated calls with account side effects. Record sent, recipient_selected, and retry_safe as observed fields, not as replay authorization.
If the next decision needs a live observation, name the exact unresolved question and ask before login, session changes, or LinkedIn writes. If the human declines, keep the packet-and-source verdict.
Only after an explicit yes for this run. Use uv run, never uvx, so the server reflects the workspace. Record the actual tool, arguments, runtime, account variant, code SHA, and timestamp before the call. Keep the reporter's installed-launcher context distinct from a workspace check.
git status --porcelain | head -5
git log -1 --onelineIf the workspace is dirty, ask before continuing. If a login is required, ask; do not run --login as a default.
PORT=8765
while lsof -nP -iTCP:$PORT -sTCP:LISTEN >/dev/null 2>&1; do PORT=$((PORT+1)); done
echo $PORT > /tmp/repro-$NUM.port
uv run -m linkedin_mcp_server --transport streamable-http --port $PORT --log-level INFO > /tmp/repro-$NUM.log 2>&1 &
SERVER_PID=$!
echo $SERVER_PID > /tmp/repro-$NUM.pid
for i in $(seq 1 30); do
lsof -nP -iTCP:$PORT -sTCP:LISTEN >/dev/null 2>&1 && break
kill -0 $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null || { echo "Server died during startup. Tail of /tmp/repro-$NUM.log:" >&2; tail -20 /tmp/repro-$NUM.log >&2; exit 1; }
sleep 1
done
lsof -nP -iTCP:$PORT -sTCP:LISTEN >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "Server never bound port $PORT after 30s" >&2; tail -20 /tmp/repro-$NUM.log >&2; exit 1; }PORT=$(cat /tmp/repro-$NUM.port)
curl -s -D /tmp/repro-$NUM-headers -X POST http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/mcp \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"repro-issue","version":"1.0"}}}' \
> /tmp/repro-$NUM-init.json
SESSION_ID=$(grep -i 'Mcp-Session-Id' /tmp/repro-$NUM-headers | awk '{print $2}' | tr -d '\r')
[ -z "$SESSION_ID" ] && { echo "MCP initialize returned no Mcp-Session-Id. Tail of /tmp/repro-$NUM.log:" >&2; tail -20 /tmp/repro-$NUM.log >&2; kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null; exit 1; }
grep -q '"error"' /tmp/repro-$NUM-init.json && { echo "Initialize returned a protocol error. Execution limit." >&2; cat /tmp/repro-$NUM-init.json >&2; kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null; exit 1; }
curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/mcp \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-H "Mcp-Session-Id: $SESSION_ID" \
-d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"notifications/initialized","params":{}}' \
> /tmp/repro-$NUM-initialized.json
grep -q '"error"' /tmp/repro-$NUM-initialized.json && { echo "notifications/initialized returned a protocol error. Execution limit." >&2; cat /tmp/repro-$NUM-initialized.json >&2; kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null; exit 1; }Capture and inspect both response bodies before tools/call. A protocol or validation error is an execution limit. Do not retry around it.
SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
TOOL="<TOOL>"
ARGS_JSON='{<ARGS>}'
jq -n --arg t "$TOOL" --argjson a "$ARGS_JSON" --arg sha "$SHA" \
'{tool: $t, arguments: $a, sha: $sha}' \
> /tmp/repro-issue-$NUM-meta.json
curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/mcp \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" \
-H "Mcp-Session-Id: $SESSION_ID" \
-d "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":3,\"method\":\"tools/call\",\"params\":{\"name\":\"$TOOL\",\"arguments\":$ARGS_JSON}}" \
| tee /tmp/repro-issue-$NUM-main.json | head -200If the issue does not pin a concrete target, do not invent one to complete the live check. Ask, or stop with the packet-and-source verdict.
Preserve /tmp/repro-issue-$NUM-main.json and /tmp/repro-issue-$NUM-meta.json only for a genuine captured run. A run from a non-main commit must identify that SHA in the meta file. Do not claim an on-main baseline because of the filename.
kill $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null
wait $SERVER_PID 2>/dev/null
rm -f /tmp/repro-$NUM-headers /tmp/repro-$NUM.log /tmp/repro-$NUM.port /tmp/repro-$NUM.pid /tmp/repro-$NUM-init.json /tmp/repro-$NUM-initialized.jsonLive verdicts, when a run happened:
**#<N>**. <one-line issue summary>
**SHA:** <short-sha>
**Inspected:** <packet fields and source files>
**Facts established:** <list>
**Unverified:** <runtime claims not checked>
**Verdict:** <supported by reporter evidence | confirmed in source | reproduced in the stated environment | needs more evidence | not supported by the supplied evidence>
**Evidence:** <2 to 4 lines>
**Likely code path:** <file:line>. <one-line why>
**Baseline:** <path and SHA, or none>
**Next:** <missing fields | /3-verify-pr-fix N | fix sketch | no live check needed>uv run, not uvx, for a workspace live check. Use the reporter's launcher only to test that installation./3-verify-pr-fix.f4fc67d
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.