Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, actionable body with executable commands and a clear sequenced workflow including a verification checkpoint. Minor conciseness redundancy and the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop keep it just short of top marks on two dimensions.
Suggestions
Consolidate the version string so it appears once (reference it from 'What happens' to the 'Version format' section) to remove the duplication.
Add a brief feedback loop after the verify step, e.g., 'If the PR body does not show a version, check the Actions run for failures before re-triggering.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only redundancy is the version string appearing in both 'What happens' and 'Version format', which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands (gh workflow run, npx storybook@<VERSION> sandbox/upgrade) with clearly marked placeholders covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (trigger -> build/publish -> PR body updated -> check version -> test) with a verify checkpoint ('Check the PR body for the published version') and a monitor link, but no explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill with clean section organization and no need for external references; no bundle files exist, so the well-structured single file is appropriately self-contained. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |