Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable workflow document: concrete commands, a real bundle script, and explicit user-interaction steps, all with minimal token overhead. The only weaknesses are a small sequencing wrinkle in the context-gathering step and no error-recovery guidance for the PR-creation step itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries project-specific facts Claude cannot infer (labels, template path, base-detection order, conventions); there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: complete `gh pr create` command with heredoc, concrete git commands, a real script path that exists in the bundle, an explicit label table, and named AskQuestion prompts with options. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with feedback checkpoints ("Tell the user the result", "Verify the available labels with the PR template", documented fallback to `next`). Docked one point for the step-1 "(after step 2)" cross-dependency and the absence of any failure handling for the `gh pr create` step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections in a single page with one-level-deep references only: a real `scripts/detect-base-branch.sh` file and clearly signaled cross-skill pointers (`pr`, `canary`). The inline label table is appropriately verified against the PR template rather than spun off prematurely. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |