Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an executable, well-sequenced PR-creation workflow with concrete commands and appropriately signaled one-level references to related skills and a bundled script. It could improve by adding an explicit failure-recovery loop and trimming the inlined label table.
Suggestions
Add a brief feedback loop for the `gh pr create` step (e.g., what to do on authentication or base-branch errors) to raise workflow_clarity.
Replace or shorten the inlined label-options table by pointing Claude to read the exact options from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`, reducing duplication.
Trim the detect-base-branch tie-break prose to the essentials, since the script already encodes the behavior.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with numbered steps, code blocks, and a compact label table, avoiding explanations of concepts Claude already knows; only minor passages like the tie-break detail could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands throughout (git status/diff, the detect-base-branch script, a full `gh pr create` invocation with flags, AskQuestion prompts, and a concrete label-options table) covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with checkpoints ("Verify the available labels", "Tell the user the result", "Push first if needed") give a clear sequence, but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for command failures. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into workflow steps and Notes with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (the `pr` and `canary` skills, the PR template, and the real detect-base-branch.sh script), though the label table is inlined rather than derived from the referenced template. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |