Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable reference for creating Storybook PRs with concrete commands, labels, and templates. Its main gap is presenting the work as an implicit rather than explicitly sequenced workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit numbered workflow (1. read template → 2. fill sections → 3. choose labels → 4. verify steps locally → 5. run gh pr create --draft) so the sequence and checkpoints are unambiguous.
Tighten the canary-label paragraph to the essential rule, moving the fork-publishing detail to a one-line note.
Make the validation checkpoint more prominent by calling out the "Verify your own steps first" step as a mandatory gate before running the create command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and limited to Storybook-specific conventions Claude would not already know (labels, QA heuristics, Chromatic URLs); only minor stretches like the lengthy canary explanation could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready guidance: a concrete `gh pr create --draft` command, exact label names, a title format with worked examples, and filled Chromatic URL templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow (title → labels → body from template → draft command) is clear and includes a "Verify your own steps first" checkpoint, but it is presented as a reference rather than an explicit numbered sequence with full validation loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized under clear section headers with only a single one-level reference to the repo's `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`; it is over 50 lines so the simple-skill 5 does not apply, but structure is good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |