Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, well-validated workflow with excellent user-interaction scripting and genuine one-level-deep reference structure. The main cost is length: dense compatibility and guardrail blocks duplicate reference-file content inline, which inflates the SKILL.md well past overview weight.
Suggestions
Move the Step 4a compatibility rule enumeration (the dashboard/fees_collector/losses_collector combination checks) into references/compatibility-matrix.md and keep only the validation gate plus the BLOCKED/CAUTION output format in SKILL.md — the matrix file already exists for exactly this content.
Compress the Step 3 critical guardrails into short one-line pointers (e.g., 'hybrid flows → Step 3b in discovery-questions.md', 'account-type question → account-types.md') instead of multi-clause run-on paragraphs that restate reference-file logic.
Replace the four reprinted checklist blocks with a single 'update the checklist after each step' instruction and one canonical checklist definition, eliminating ~30 lines of repeated output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body doesn't explain known concepts and enforces its own brevity rules, but it is noticeably over-long at ~340 lines with real tightening opportunities: the Step 4a compatibility rules ('If dashboard: "express" + fees_collector: "stripe"...' and the near-identical following bullet) repeat public-preview disclosure text verbatim and duplicate material that belongs in compatibility-matrix.md, the Step 3 guardrails are multi-clause run-on paragraphs duplicating discovery-questions.md content, and the four-line progress checklist is reprinted four times. It is above anchor 2 because nothing is concept padding — it is all operational instruction — but below anchor 4 because whole blocks (Step 3 guardrails, Step 4a checks 3) restate reference-file content inline. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable for an instruction-only skill: exact question scripts ('Tell me about your business. Pick whichever is easiest:'), exact option sets with mapped outcomes, copy-paste warning text with links, concrete grep patterns ('connected_account', 'transfer_data', 'separate_charges'), and precise pre-fill rules keyed to HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW confidence. Every step tells the agent exactly what to do, read, and output. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-6 are clearly sequenced with a visible progress checklist, and validation is explicit throughout: Step 1f fee-economics validation 'ALWAYS runs, even on auto-filled values', the MANDATORY Step 4a compatibility validation before any recommendation is presented, the merchant-of-record consistency check, and the fee-structure checkpoint. Feedback loops are present — BLOCKED configs trigger 're-run the recommendation with the corrected configuration' and user corrections re-enter the relevant question. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Eight references (terminology-rules.md, company-researcher.md, decision-matrix.md, discovery-questions.md, account-types.md, charge-patterns.md, compatibility-matrix.md, recommendation-template.md) are all real files, clearly signaled with 'Read <references/...>' directives, and none nest further references — one level deep as required. It falls short of anchor 5 because substantial reference material is inlined in the main file (the Step 3 critical guardrails and the Step 4a compatibility rules largely restate discovery-questions.md and compatibility-matrix.md), making the SKILL.md heavier than an overview warrants. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |