Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered interactive workflow with exceptional actionability and validation/checkpoint discipline, backed by a real, well-signposted one-level-deep reference bundle. Its main weakness is token efficiency: repeated checklist blocks and inline duplication of compatibility-matrix rules make the body heavier than it needs to be.
Suggestions
Replace the five repeated progress-checklist code blocks with a single instruction (e.g. "after each step, update the checklist shown in Step 0") or show the checklist once and reference it thereafter.
In Step 4a, defer the full blocked/allowed combination enumeration to references/compatibility-matrix.md and keep only the two or three most critical BLOCKED rules plus the public-preview exceptions inline.
Break the 15-line Step 3 SaaS guardrail run-on sentence into a compact table or move the detailed dashboard-selection logic into references/discovery-questions.md or references/account-types.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content is genuinely non-obvious Stripe Connect decision logic (compatibility tuples, public-preview paths, fee-economics rules) that earns its tokens, but it could be tightened: the progress checklist is repeated verbatim five times, Step 4a's blocked-combination enumeration (e.g. "If `dashboard: "full"` + `fees_collector: "stripe"` + charge pattern is `destination` or `separate`, treat as BLOCKED") duplicates rules already in references/compatibility-matrix.md, and the two near-identical public-preview bullets for the express/stripe and express/application direct-charge paths repeat the same disclosure text. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready throughout: exact user prompts ("Tell me about your business. Pick whichever is easiest:"), numbered options with defined follow-up actions, verbatim warning copy with links, concrete grep patterns ("transfers.create", "account.updated"), exact output templates, and a defined plan file path (connect-recommend-plan.md). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are strictly sequenced with explicit gating ("ALWAYS runs first", "MANDATORY before presenting recommendation"), progress checklists after each phase, validation checkpoints (Step 4a compatibility validation that BLOCKS bad configs, fee-economics check that "MUST run even when the fee was auto-filled", the 4-item fee-structure checkpoint before Step 4), and error-recovery feedback loops ("Change something" → re-ask the relevant question, "Refine a decision"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Eight reference files all exist with real content (99–382 lines), are one level deep, and are clearly signposted at point of use ("Read <references/decision-matrix.md> and apply it"); orchestration stays in SKILL.md while matrices, question scripts, and templates live in references. Minor gaps: no overview/index of the reference bundle, and the ~340-line body retains sizable inline rule detail (the Step 4a enumeration) that overlaps the referenced compatibility matrix rather than deferring to it. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |