CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

connect-required-verification-information

Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.

68

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is connect-required-verification-information in stripe/ai

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced operational skill with explicit validation and error-recovery loops throughout the flow, held back only by mild repetition and a monolithic structure that inlines large reference tables (row definitions, response schemas) that belong in separate bundle files. The curl examples and response-reading guidance are copy-paste ready.

Suggestions

Move the row-definition regex tables (account/entity/person families), the internal-field-to-external-language map, and the get-requirements-for-setups response-field documentation into a references/ file (e.g. references/row-definitions.md and references/response-fields.md), keeping SKILL.md as the flow overview with clearly signaled links.

Deduplicate the repeated 'using the [Interaction contract]' instruction — state the rule once and reference it by section name elsewhere — and consolidate the downstream re-check rules, which currently appear in both 'Hard rules' and 'Read the API responses'.

Fix the broken self-referential link targets (e.g. https://docs.stripe.com/.md#interaction-contract) by using ordinary markdown anchors to the in-document sections, and reformat the account row-definitions block (lines 357–359), which currently spills mid-list onto a continuation line.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with non-obvious operational constraints (dependency chain, capability filter algorithm, enforcement-limit rendering rules) and assumes Claude's competence — no padding explaining Stripe, curl, or mermaid — but the instruction to ask follow-ups "using the [Interaction contract]" is repeated roughly six times and the downstream re-check rules appear in both 'Hard rules' and 'Read the API responses', so minor trimming is possible.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact endpoint URLs, copy-paste curl commands with --data-urlencode parameters for both naive and smart user scenarios, exact response field names (country_map.FR.entity_type_structures, requirements[field_name], extras[].value), and a worked example URL with real values — covering the common cases end to end.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 12-step agent flow is explicitly sequenced with a mermaid dependency chain, validation checkpoints at every stage (pre-validating options before display, re-checking downstream fields on any upstream change), and explicit error-recovery feedback loops (validation_errors → ask user to correct via the interaction contract; build_errors → retry, then report; transport failures treated as retryable rather than business conclusions).

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

There are no bundle files at all — references/, scripts/, and assets/ do not exist — and this 400+ line SKILL.md inlines material that clearly belongs in separate reference files (the row-definition regex tables, the internal-to-external terminology map, and the get-requirements-for-setups response-field documentation), even though section headers and internal anchor links provide reasonable in-document navigation.

3 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly distinctive, trigger-rich description with excellent natural keyword coverage (verification, onboarding, KYC, requirements), but it is entirely composed of 'when' clauses and never tells the reader what the skill does. Adding a one-clause statement of the skill's action would make it fully complete.

Suggestions

Add a leading 'what' clause before the 'Use when' triggers, e.g. 'Fetches and presents the verification requirements a Stripe Connect connected account must provide, as tables or a JSON summary, based on platform country, account country, business type, and capabilities.'

State the skill's two output forms (human-readable requirement tables and the JSON-style summary) so users know what result to expect, not just when to invoke it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names concrete domain facets ("verification fields, documents, or business details", "platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability") and concrete task shapes ("compare requirements between connected-account setups"), but never states the skill's actual actions (fetching requirements from Stripe docs endpoints and rendering tables), so it lists several specifics with a coverage gap rather than comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Every clause is a "when" trigger ("Use this skill when the user asks...", "when they need to compare...", "or when they ask which..."); the "what" — what the skill actually does to answer these questions — is entirely absent, falling between anchor 2 (only 'when' present) and a fully complete description.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It comprehensively covers natural user phrasings and synonyms — "verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements" plus "connected account", "documents", and "business type" — matching how a user would naturally ask for this skill.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves out a clear, narrow niche (Stripe Connect connected-account verification requirements) with trigger terms that no other plausible skill would claim, so conflict risk is minimal.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
stripe/ai
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.