Conciseness

The ~60-line body is lean and every section earns its place: when-to-use/when-not-to-use triggers, a three-line limitation guard against a plausible misuse, setup checks, and a copy-paste command. There is no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padded sections, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

Actionability

The guidance is fully executable: a complete copy-paste-ready command with all relevant flags (`kyotee ask "..." --strategy council --consensus judge --budget 3.00 --wait`), concrete setup verification (`kyotee serve`, `kyotee providers`, `KYOTEE_URL` default), a documented machine-readable `--json` contract, and explicit exit-code behavior — matching the fully-executable anchor.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-action skill whose action is unambiguous (check engine is running → run `kyotee ask --wait` → incorporate the answer and surface dissent), which the simple-skill exception allows to score 5. It additionally documents explicit error feedback: non-zero exits on engine errors or budget exhaustion, and fast-failure with a remedy message when the engine is absent, so it does not fall to the checkpoint-gap anchor at 4.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and none are needed — all content legitimately belongs in SKILL.md. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 5; the section structure (When to use / When NOT to use / Limitation / Setup / Usage) is clear and easy to navigate.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — "a cross-vendor Council that debates to consensus", "a Two-Brain divergent/convergent debate", "a forced tool-checking solo run", and "a synthesised answer (with dissent noted)" — which matches the comprehensive-coverage anchor, but the second-person phrase "you want a synthesised answer back in this session" triggers the required 1-point specificity penalty, dropping it to 4.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the what is "Delegate a hard decision or conundrum to the Kyotee harness engine" with three named strategies, and the when is the explicit clause "Use when a decision is high-stakes, genuinely contested, or benefits from multiple model perspectives". This matches the top anchor with concrete trigger phrases.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases like "hard decision or conundrum", "high-stakes", "genuinely contested", and "multiple model perspectives" would plausibly appear in a user's request, but common variations such as "second opinion" or "cross-check with other models" are missing, matching the good-coverage-with-few-gaps anchor rather than the comprehensive one.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Delegating decisions to an external cross-vendor debate engine is a clear niche with distinct triggers (high-stakes, contested, multi-perspective decisions) and a named dependency (the kyotee engine), so conflict risk with other skills is minimal — matching the top anchor rather than the minor-overlap anchor below it.