Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured body built around five executable workflows with real convergence diagnostics and troubleshooting. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: everything lives inline with no reference files to keep the overview lean.
Suggestions
Move the longer worked workflows (e.g. convergence diagnostics, model comparison) into reference files under ./references/ and link to them from a concise overview, so SKILL.md stays a lean entry point.
Integrate the convergence check as an explicit gate inside the main MCMC workflow (run -> check R-hat/tau -> rerun if not converged) rather than as a standalone section.
Trim the duplicated 'When to Use' bullets that restate the description, keeping the body focused on how to execute.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and code-forward, assuming Claude's competence without explaining basic Bayesian concepts; a few inline comments and the duplicated 'When to Use' framing could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Five complete, copy-paste-ready Python workflows (sampling, corner plot, diagnostics, posterior predictive, model comparison) cover the common cases with real, executable code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced with explicit validation thresholds (R-hat < 1.01, chain/tau > 50) and a troubleshooting feedback table, but the diagnostics are presented as a separate step rather than an integrated gate inside the main sampling workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers, but all content (~190 lines) is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references to split out the longer workflow details. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |