Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with clear sequencing, explicit validation via status branching, and clean one-level-deep reference usage. The only weakness is repetition of the patient-data boundary statement across multiple sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated patient/phenotype/family/segregation boundary into one canonical statement in 'Enforce the input boundary' and reference it from later sections rather than restating it verbatim each time.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of generic-concept padding, but the no-patient/phenotype/family/segregation boundary is restated in several sections and the report boundary statement, which could be trimmed to a single canonical statement cross-referenced where needed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable copy-paste curl JSON-RPC call, concrete tool names with parameter shapes, a status-to-action table, and request examples in the referenced contract — covering the common cases directly. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The variant-evidence workflow is explicitly sequenced (resolve → branch on status → review without overclaiming) with the status table acting as validation checkpoints and an explicit stop rule for ambiguous results. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md reads as a well-organized overview with a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/mcp-contract.md, verified present) for the detailed contract; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |