Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content with a verified script, correct CLI documentation, and a clear usage sequence, but it is padded with a full example JSON output, duplicated recommendation thresholds, and code examples that teach familiar patterns. Trimming to the command, a condensed output schema, and one decision example would raise token efficiency substantially.
Suggestions
Replace the 57-line example JSON with a condensed schema showing the key fields (or move it to references/output-schema.md), keeping only the fields the usage snippets rely on.
Remove the Strategic Recommendations threshold tables — the script computes these, so Claude only needs the script's output, not a restatement of its branching logic.
Cut the three Step 2/3 code snippets down to one representative example; patterns like joblib Parallel and torch.device selection are already known, so one snippet plus the field names suffices.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Several padded sections: a 57-line example JSON dump, a full restatement of the script's recommendation thresholds (duplicating logic the script itself computes), three separate usage code snippets teaching patterns Claude already knows (joblib Parallel, torch.device), and generic best-practice/troubleshooting advice ("Close other applications before detection", "Memory readings are snapshots"). Accurate but noticeably verbose. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: the exact command "python scripts/detect_resources.py" with documented -o/-v flags (verified against the script's argparse), the psutil install command, and copy-paste-ready snippets for reading the output JSON and selecting a device. Common cases are covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (run detection → read and apply recommendations → make informed decisions) with a troubleshooting section covering failure modes (GPU not detected, script failure, inaccurate readings). Not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation cap applies, but the main flow lacks an explicit checkpoint confirming the JSON was created and populated before decisions are based on it. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file (scripts/detect_resources.py) is real, clearly referenced, and one level deep; sections are well organized with descriptive headers. Minor gap: the full output schema and threshold tables are inlined in SKILL.md when they could live in a references/ file, though for a one-script skill keeping them inline is defensible. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |