CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ginkgo-cloud-lab

Submit and manage protocols on Ginkgo Bioworks Cloud Lab (cloud.ginkgo.bio), a web-based interface for autonomous lab execution on Reconfigurable Automation Carts (RACs). Use when the user wants to run protein expression and purification (cell-free, E. coli, or Pichia), HiBiT or A280 or LabChip quantification, IVT mRNA/circRNA synthesis, thermal shift / developability assays, Echo-MS enzyme or analyte methods, SPR target onboarding, fluorescent pixel art, or otherwise interact with Ginkgo Cloud Lab services. Covers protocol selection, input preparation, pricing, and ordering workflows.

74

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is ginkgo-cloud-lab in K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and token-efficient, using compact tables and a decision tree to convey a broad protocol catalog while deferring detail to one-level-deep reference files. Actionability and workflow clarity are strong but slightly held back by high-level ordering steps and an implicit rather than explicit validation/review checkpoint.

Suggestions

Make the ordering workflow's validation loop explicit, e.g. add a step: 'Review the returned feasibility report and price quote; if requirements are unmet, revise parameters/inputs and resubmit before finalizing the order.'

Tighten actionability by noting where each ordering step is performed in the UI (e.g. which page/tab handles parameter configuration and template upload) so the guidance is closer to copy-paste-followable.

Clarify the authentication flow beyond 'account creation or institutional access may be required' (e.g. whether SSO/institutional login is offered or a waitlist applies) so users know what to expect before reaching the protocol catalog.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and table-driven with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the instrument inventory and citation procedure are genuine domain specifics that earn their tokens, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete actionable guidance for an instruction-only web-UI skill (specific URLs, file formats, prices, a decision tree, and per-protocol reference links), but ordering steps such as "Configure parameters" and "Add any special requirements" stay high-level without exact UI navigation; sits just below the fully-executable anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step ordering sequence is present, and the platform-returned feasibility report and price quote serve as an implicit validation gate so the destructive/batch cap at 3 does not apply; the explicit "review the feasibility report, revise and resubmit if needed" checkpoint is not spelled out, keeping it just below the score-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The SKILL.md is a concise overview that links to 17 real, one-level-deep reference files (all present and correctly referenced) via well-signaled tables, with clear navigation guidance ("Pick a protocol below, then read its reference file"), matching the clear-overview one-level-deep anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it states concrete capabilities, provides comprehensive natural trigger terms covering the full protocol catalog, and explicitly pairs a what-statement with a use-when clause in a distinctive niche. Voice is third-person/standard trigger form, incurring no penalty.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ("Submit and manage protocols", "run protein expression and purification", "HiBiT or A280 or LabChip quantification", "IVT mRNA/circRNA synthesis", "thermal shift / developability assays", "Echo-MS enzyme or analyte methods", "SPR target onboarding", "fluorescent pixel art") with comprehensive coverage of the catalog, matching the score-5 anchor; no neighboring anchor fits better since coverage is both specific and broad.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Submit and manage protocols ... Covers protocol selection, input preparation, pricing, and ordering workflows") and when ("Use when the user wants to run ... or otherwise interact with Ginkgo Cloud Lab services") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural domain terms users would actually name, including synonyms across expression hosts (cell-free, E. coli, Pichia) and quantification readouts (HiBiT, A280, LabChip), plus named assays (IVT, thermal shift, Echo-MS, SPR); matches the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Ginkgo Cloud Lab on cloud.ginkgo.bio with named protocols and instruments) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills; matches the clear-niche anchor.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
synthetic-sciences/openscience
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.