Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable with executable code and real examples, but token efficiency and structure suffer from duplicated function definitions and an unreferenced bundle script, and workflows lack explicit validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Reference scripts/predict_glycosylation.py from the body and move the long function implementations there, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with short examples.
Remove the duplicate find_n_glycosylation_sites definition — keep one canonical implementation and point to it from Quick Start.
Reframe Typical Workflows as sequenced steps with explicit validation (e.g. predict -> cross-check against UniProt annotations -> report TP/FP/FN) rather than bare single-line calls.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and domain-specific, but the body duplicates find_n_glycosylation_sites (a compact Quick Start version and an expanded Core Capabilities version) and inlines long code that could reference the bundled script, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready Python functions with real example sequences (human EPO) and concrete outputs, matching the anchor for executable code with specific examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Typical Workflows are presented as single-line function invocations without explicit multi-step sequencing or validation checkpoints; the UniProt TP/FP/FN comparison is embedded in code rather than framed as a checkpointed workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has clear sections but is inline-heavy (~400 lines) and never references the bundled scripts/predict_glycosylation.py, leaving that file orphaned; content that should be offloaded to the script is duplicated inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |