CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

literature-review

Answer literature-review requests with a concise, source-grounded narrative by default. Escalate to PRISMA screening, evidence tables, figures, files, or PDFs only when the user explicitly asks for a systematic, scoping, or publication-formatted review.

Invalid
This skill can't be scored yet
Validation errors are blocking scoring. Review and fix them to unlock Quality, Impact and Security scores. See what needs fixing →
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Low

Low-risk findings.

1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.

Low

W011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).

What this means

The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.

Why it was flagged

In “literature-review”, the agent’s required systematic-review workflow ingests outsider-authored free text by reading titles/abstracts and potentially full texts obtained from public research databases (e.g., PubMed/bioRxiv/arXiv/Semantic Scholar) during phases 2–3 when screening/search results and documents are processed.

Report incorrect finding
Repository
synthetic-sciences/openscience
Audited
Security analysis
Snyk

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.