llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
61
Quality
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Securityby
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./backend/cli/skills/llm-tools/llm-as-judge-evaluation/SKILL.mdLoading evals
- Repository
- synthetic-sciences/openscience
- Commit
3a6c3a9
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.