Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body: explicit multi-step workflow with validation and correction loops, and exemplary progressive disclosure through anchored, well-indexed reference files. The only deductions are minor routing duplication and the absence of an inline worked example of an MCP call.
Suggestions
Consolidate the routing duplicated between the Commands and Skill Boundaries tables (or cross-reference one from the other) to trim repeated implement/tokens/rules/code-connect guidance.
State the Code Connect plan/seat requirement once (in the code-connect command section) instead of both the Capabilities table and the command workflow.
Inline one short worked example of a design-context MCP call with clientLanguages/clientFrameworks in the Operating Procedure to reach fully copy-paste-ready guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with directive, non-obvious guidance (MCP tool roles, call budgets, correction requirements) and does not explain concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimming possible: routing for the four commands appears in both the Commands and Skill Boundaries tables, and Code Connect plan/seat requirements are stated twice (Capabilities table and code-connect section). Not 3: no padded sections or unnecessary explanations; only small duplication. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: the exact design-context parameters ("clientLanguages and clientFrameworks matched to the inspected repository"), server-name examples ("user-Figma Desktop", "plugin-figma-figma"), and per-unit correction instructions. Not 5: no executable example of an actual MCP tool call or code/token mapping sample inline — the fully concrete examples are deferred to the reference files, so the body alone stops slightly short of copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step Operating Procedure is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: early screenshot capture, per-unit correction ("Fix discrepancies before moving on"), a final assembly pass, a Verification Checklist, and the Correction Requirement's "Do not mark... complete after a single pass" feedback loop. Failure Handling adds error-recovery routing. This matches the anchor-5 pattern of sequence + validation + feedback loops + checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview: detailed material (call budgets, correction loop, Code Connect steps, troubleshooting) is split into five existing reference files, each linked with section anchors (e.g., implementation-patterns.md#mcp-call-budget) and indexed in a Reference Files table with explicit load-when conditions. References are one level deep and clearly signaled, matching the anchor-5 structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |