Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable conflict-resolution workflow with explicit validation feedback loops and clean progressive disclosure to real, one-level-deep reference files. Its main weakness is conciseness: the per-type resolution strategies are repeated three times and the sample dialogue is verbose.
Suggestions
Collapse the triple-repeated resolution strategies: keep the detailed 'Resolution Patterns' sections and retain either the 'Common Patterns Reference' quick lookup OR the 'Quick Reference Card' table, not both.
Tighten the 'When Resolution is Unclear' mock dialogue — the four-option sample block can be shortened to a brief example without reproducing a full conflict hunk and four labeled options.
Normalize the script paths (e.g. '.forge/skills/resolve-conflicts/scripts/...') to the relative 'scripts/' location so navigation matches the actual bundle layout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient and domain-specific rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the resolution strategies are restated three times (detailed 'Resolution Patterns' sections, the 'Common Patterns Reference' quick lookup, and the 'Quick Reference Card' table) and the mock dialogue under 'When Resolution is Unclear' is long, matching the score-2 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than the score-3 'every token earns its place' level. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands (git status, git checkout --ours, cargo update, npm install, protoc) and concrete script invocations (handle-deleted-modified.sh, validate-conflicts.sh) plus a full plan template and commit-message template, matching the score-3 'fully executable code/commands' anchor rather than the score-2 pseudocode level. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence (Assess, Plan+approve, Deleted-Modified, Execute, Validate, Compile/Test, Finalize) includes explicit validation checkpoints — validate-conflicts.sh in Step 5 and a test rerun feedback loop in Step 6 — matching the score-3 anchor with feedback loops for these batch/destructive operations rather than the score-2 level with implicit checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that clearly signals one-level-deep references to real files ('Read references/patterns.md section...', 'see references/sample-plan.md') and separate scripts, with verified files that do not nest further references, matching the score-3 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor rather than the score-2 level with inline content that should be split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |