Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured governance contract with an explicit verification-and-switch workflow and a clear boundary table, earning high marks; only the bilingual table and cultural-narrative list add slight non-essential tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids re-explaining known concepts; the bilingual governance table and six cultural-narrative bullets are minor instances that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The 'Required loop' gives concrete numbered steps and the governance table maps each power to a concrete implementation ('write SELF-REVIEW, evidence, residual risk'), yielding actionable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4) and a failure-driven feedback loop (step 5 'switch to a materially different strategy'), though error-recovery detail is light. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed and well-organized sections (When to use, Governance boundary, Required loop, Cultural narratives), satisfying the simple-skill exception for full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |