pua-en

Performance-coaching mode for repeated failures, passive behavior, completion-quality issues, or explicit try-harder requests. Uses structured troubleshooting and evidence-first delivery habits.

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pua-en/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and clearly sequenced with strong validation checkpoints, but it is heavily padded with motivational rhetoric that should be moved into separate reference files for progressive disclosure and token efficiency.

Suggestions

Move the Corporate PIP Flavor Pack quote library into a separate references/ file (e.g. references/flavor-packs.md), keeping only the selection table and auto-selection tag format inline in SKILL.md.

Trim the repeated proactivity-enforcement rhetoric blocks (the 'Proactivity Enforcement Rhetoric' bullets substantially overlap the Proactivity Levels table and the Anti-Rationalization Table) to reduce padding.

Extract the Agent Team Integration protocol into its own reference file, since it is an optional deployment context rather than core skill behavior.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~345-line body is noticeably verbose, with substantial rhetorical padding (the Corporate PIP Flavor Pack quote library and repeated proactivity rhetoric) that does not earn its context-window cost, though it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.	2 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete, specific guidance — a 5-step methodology, a 7-point checklist, a [PIP-REPORT] template, and escalation tables with explicit 'What You Must Do' actions — with only minor rhetorical gaps keeping it below fully copy-paste-ready.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Multi-step processes (the 5-step methodology, pressure escalation L1-L4, the 7-point checklist) are clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates ('Dimensions 1-4 must be completed before asking'), feedback loops (mirror-check, retrospective), and checklists for complex flows.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	It is a monolithic single file with no bundle files; large blocks that belong in separate references (the ~100-line flavor-pack library, the Agent Team integration) are inlined rather than split, though section headers provide some navigability.	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-crafted: it names a distinctive niche, enumerates concrete trigger conditions, and answers both 'what' and 'when' explicitly in third person. Its only weakness is mild abstraction in naming the method, which keeps specificity and trigger-term coverage just below fully comprehensive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete trigger conditions ('repeated failures, passive behavior, completion-quality issues') and methods ('structured troubleshooting', 'evidence-first delivery habits'), with only minor abstraction gaps keeping it below the fully comprehensive anchor 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both what it does ('Performance-coaching mode') and when to use it via an enumerated equivalent 'Use when' trigger clause ('for repeated failures, passive behavior, completion-quality issues, or explicit try-harder requests').	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Good coverage of natural phrases users would say ('try-harder requests', 'passive behavior', 'repeated failures'), but missing common synonyms/variations that would push it to anchor 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear behavior-coaching niche with distinctive triggers unlikely to fire for ordinary task skills, matching the minimal-conflict anchor 5.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: tanweai/pua
Path: skills/pua-en/SKILL.md
Commit: ac50267

Reviewed: 10 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.