Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly structured, actionable iterative-loop protocol with strong workflow clarity and explicit validation feedback loops; its main weaknesses are a dangling script reference and minor backstory verbosity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and operational (gate protocol, core rules, startup, escalation table, completion checklist) and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; the only trim candidates are the autoresearch backstory epigraph and comparison table, which are minor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete executable startup command, explicit --verify inference rules with examples, a JSONL history schema, and concrete markers (<promise>, <loop-abort>, <loop-pause>); the referenced setup script is not present in the bundle, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The iterative workflow is fully sequenced (read history → git log → execute → verify → repeat) with explicit two-phase validation (Phase 1 self-verify, Phase 2 Oracle), a rejection-recovery feedback loop, and stall-detection checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear labeled sections as a self-contained single-file protocol, but it exceeds 50 lines and references a scripts/setup-pua-loop.sh file that is not in the bundle, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |