Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured instruction skill: every section is tool-specific and executable, the multi-step read-and-present workflow has explicit error-handling feedback loops, and detail is correctly offloaded to two real one-level-deep reference files. The only weakness is minor duplication and an expendable framing paragraph that could be trimmed for token budget.
Suggestions
Trim the opening framing paragraph ('One good read of a chart is three things in order…') to a single directive sentence — its guidance is restated in Making the call count and Reading the response.
State the risk disclaimer and hand-back-the-decision rule once: Presenting step 7 and the Conduct bullets repeat the same two points; consolidating into the Conduct section removes ~4 lines.
In Presenting, step 7 could reference the Conduct bullet rather than restating the full disclaimer, keeping the output template shorter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line is connector-specific knowledge Claude cannot know (response shapes, funding thresholds, indicator field semantics, argument limits), so it is far from the verbose anchors. But there is trimmable material: the opening framing paragraph ('One good read of a chart is three things in order…'), and the risk/decision-handback point stated twice (Presenting step 7 'crypto derivatives are high-risk; this is market information, not advice' plus Conduct bullets 'hand the decision back' / 'the decision and the trade stay with the user'). This matches the score-4 anchor ('efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'); it is not a 5 because those few tokens do not earn their place, and not a 3 because none of it is generic conceptual padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance with concrete arguments and defaults: 'pass intervals: ["1h","4h","1d"]', 'symbols: ["BTCUSDT","ETHUSDT","SOLUSDT"] in ONE call', 'Default rsi, macd, ema, bollinger', 'periods ({"ema":[9,21,55,200],"rsi":7})', exact limits ('indicators (≤ 19)', 'limit ≤ 500'), symbol naming rules ('Append USDT to a bare coin'), and an exact 7-step presentation template with a label format ('RSI(14) 41.3 — neutral, falling'). Matches the score-5 anchor ('fully executable… specific examples cover the common cases'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is a clear pipeline (Tools → Making the call count → Reading the response → Presenting → Conduct) with explicit error feedback loops: a symbol returning no data routes to 'get_tracked_symbols… only when a symbol returns no data', 'an unknown key is rejected, so use the documented names only', '{ value: null, reason: "insufficient_data" } } means the tape is too short… say so, do not substitute', and 'warnings[] lists anything that was thinned or missing'. The read-only workflow needs no destructive-operation validation cap. Matches the score-5 anchor (clear sequence, feedback loops, an explicit presentation checklist); not a 4 because the checkpoints that exist are explicit, not implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that pushes per-indicator field detail and derivatives detail to exactly two one-level-deep references, both real files, each signaled at its point of need: 'Details in references/derivatives-guide.md' and 'Per-indicator fields and conventional readings: references/indicator-guide.md'. The Tools table keeps bulk detail out of the body. Matches the score-5 anchor ('clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split'). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |