Conciseness

Every section adds domain knowledge Claude cannot have — inclusive-downward "importance", prefix-match "coin", "resolutionStatus" semantics, the 24×timeframe tracking window, the sub-1 R:R caveat — with zero padding or explanation of known concepts. Not level 4 because I found no trimmable over-explanation; the only repetition (decision stays with the user, ~3 short clauses across 114 lines) is deliberate reinforcement of a compliance-critical point in a high-risk domain.

Actionability

Fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: a tool table with argument ranges and defaults ("limit 1–50 (default 20)"), exact conversion formulas ("TP = price × (1 + pct/100)"), a status table, and a literal answer skeleton (table columns; headline → levels → triggers → current price → outcome → risk note). Not level 4 because guidance is copy-paste executable for every common case, including null-field and empty-result handling.

Workflow Clarity

Four workflows each map a user intent to a named tool with argument choices ("get_signals with the limit the user implies (default 10 if they gave no number)") and explicit checkpoints: check each row's coin field before presenting, handle empty results by saying so, detect stale pending signals, and compare livePrice against levels in the same units. Not level 4 because edge-case handling is explicit throughout, and read-only tool calls carry no destructive/batch validation requirement.

Progressive Disclosure

Frequently-needed material lives inline while the full glossary is split to a clearly signaled, one-level-deep, verified-existing reference: "For the full field glossary, including the indicatorValues keys, read references/signal-fields.md." Not level 4 because navigation is unambiguous and no content that belongs in the reference is inlined.

Specificity

"Query, explain and evaluate" plus enumerated concrete capabilities — "the newest signals, signals for one coin", "entry / take-profit / stop levels and triggered conditions", "whether a signal still stands at the current price", "hit rate, hits vs stops over the last 4h to 7d" — matches the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage; not level 4 because no meaningful capability gap remains.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Query, explain and evaluate TraderSpy's AI crypto futures signals" with subtasks) and when ("Use this whenever the user mentions... even when they never say the word 'signal'"). This mirrors the anchor-5 example structure exactly; not level 4 because the when-clause is fully explicit rather than merely present.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasings are quoted verbatim ("any setups", "what is the AI seeing") alongside synonyms ("crypto signals", "AI alerts", "long/short ideas", "signal performance or track record", "TraderSpy alerts"), matching the anchor for comprehensive natural-term coverage including synonyms. Not level 4 because even colloquial variations users actually say are present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A named product niche (TraderSpy AI signals) plus explicit negative boundaries — "Not for placing trades... not for whale or top-trader positioning (smart-money), not for indicator reads on a coin (technical-analysis)" — gives a clear niche with minimal conflict risk. Not level 4 because adjacent-skill overlap is explicitly disambiguated.