CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ai-ugc-ads

When the user wants to create UGC ad campaigns, recruit UGC creators, generate AI UGC content, or scale with user-generated content. Also use when the user mentions 'UGC,' 'user-generated content,' 'creator ads,' 'Spark Ads,' 'whitelisting,' 'AI UGC,' 'Arcads,' 'Creatify,' 'creator brief,' or 'UGC testing.' This skill covers the UGC growth framework from creator recruitment through AI-powered scaling. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

72

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An information-dense, highly actionable body with clear sequenced workflows and feedback loops, weakened only by monolithic single-file structure and undated-isolated time-sensitive benchmarks. Strong on actionability and workflow, moderate on conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Split large benchmark/rate/tool tables into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. references/benchmarks.md, references/rate-cards.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with signaled links, raising progressive_disclosure.

Move the "2025-2026" dated figures into a clearly labeled, time-bound section so dated data does not penalize conciseness, and add a note to re-validate rates periodically.

Tighten or trim redundant sections (e.g. Key Metrics table vs. Section 10 Benchmarks, Questions to Ask vs. Before Starting) to reduce length without losing actionable detail.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Per-line content is lean and specific (no generic concept padding), but the body runs ~430 lines and is seeded with time-sensitive "2025-2026" date stamps not isolated in a deprecated section, which the rubric penalizes even when accurate.

2 / 3

Actionability

Highly executable: fill-in brief template, DM outreach script, specific dollar rate tiers, kill-criteria thresholds, scaling rules, and step-by-step Spark Ads / partnership-ads setup — copy-paste ready guidance throughout.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced (Flywheel Stage 1-4, 3x3x3 testing Phases 1-4, AI UGC workflow 1-7) with validation/feedback checkpoints such as "Kill underperformers at 48 hours" and budget-increase rules gated on CPA holding.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the entire skill is a single monolithic document; reference tables, benchmarks, and tool comparisons that could live in separate one-level-deep files are all inline, so it is organized but not appropriately split.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with concrete actions, natural trigger terms, explicit what/when guidance, and a do-not-use clause for disambiguation. It hits the top anchor on every dimension.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "create UGC ad campaigns, recruit UGC creators, generate AI UGC content, or scale with user-generated content" — rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("UGC growth framework from creator recruitment through AI-powered scaling") and when ("When the user wants to..." / "Also use when the user mentions...") with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural-language keyword coverage: "'UGC,' 'user-generated content,' 'creator ads,' 'Spark Ads,' 'whitelisting,' 'AI UGC,' 'Arcads,' 'Creatify,' 'creator brief,' or 'UGC testing'" — terms a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear UGC-ad niche with distinct triggers plus an explicit exclusion ("Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture") making conflicts unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
tech-leads-club/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.