Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted behavioral skill body: concrete, copy-paste-ready dialogue templates, a clearly sequenced pause-and-wait workflow, and a properly signaled one-level-deep reference. It is lean and actionable with only minor redundancy and no explicit error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. Minor redundancy ('offering exercises more than twice per session' appears in both 'When NOT to offer' and 'Anti-patterns') keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready dialogue templates with exact phrasing ('Would you like to do a quick learning exercise on [topic]? About 10-15 minutes.') across three concrete exercise types, plus specific escalation cues for early/later/advanced familiarity. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The offer -> ask -> [STOP] -> wait -> branch (correct/wrong) sequence is clearly laid out with explicit [STOP — wait for response] checkpoints and a correct/wrong feedback branch. Not a destructive/batch operation so the validation cap does not apply; falls just short of 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is well-organized into clear sections and the one-level-deep reference (references/PRINCIPLES.md, verified to exist) is clearly signaled for the underlying learning science. Content is appropriately split between operational techniques (main) and principles (reference); just shy of 5 because the main body is fairly substantial with multiple inline dialogue examples. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |