content-gap-analysis

Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "what am I missing", "topics to cover", "content opportunities", "what do competitors write about that I do not", "what topics am I missing", "topics my competitors cover that I lack", or "where are my content blind spots". Identifies content opportunities by finding topics and keywords your competitors cover that you do not. Reveals untapped content potential and strategic gaps in your content strategy. For broader competitive intelligence, see competitor-analysis. For general keyword discovery, see keyword-research.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and highly actionable with clear validation checkpoints, but it is significantly over-long for its purpose, padding the context window with template tables and background concepts Claude already knows. Pulling more template material into the existing reference would improve token efficiency.

Suggestions

Move the large repeated markdown output templates (e.g. the full report, calendar, and scoring matrices) into ./references/gap-analysis-frameworks.md and keep only one representative example inline in SKILL.md.

Cut background explanations Claude already knows, such as the funnel-stage purposes and content-format taxonomy tables, retaining only the gap-specific framing.

Replace the duplicated Content Coverage Matrix / Content Type Coverage Matrix / Funnel Stage sections with a single consolidated prioritization table to reduce redundancy.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body runs ~590 lines with extensive placeholder markdown templates and restates concepts Claude already knows (funnel stages, content format taxonomies); the intro paragraph and many template tables are padded beyond what the task requires.	2 / 5
Actionability	Provides a concrete 9-step structure with copy-pasteable markdown output templates, example user prompts, and a fully worked example, though templates rely heavily on [URL]/[X] placeholders rather than fully instantiated guidance.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly numbered 9-step workflow is paired with dedicated Input Validation and Output Validation checkpoint sections enumerating explicit checkboxes, giving strong sequencing and verification feedback.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Uses well-organized section headers and a single one-level-deep reference (./references/gap-analysis-frameworks.md) that exists on disk; however, the bulk of detailed template material remains inline in SKILL.md rather than being split out.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it combines a rich set of natural trigger phrases, concrete capability statements, and explicit disambiguation against neighboring skills. It clearly answers both what and when in third-person voice without padding.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions ('Identifies content opportunities', 'finding topics and keywords your competitors cover that you do not', 'Reveals untapped content potential and strategic gaps') covering the domain comprehensively.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what the skill does (identifies content opportunities by finding topics/keywords competitors cover) and when to use it via a concrete 'Use when the user asks to...' clause with multiple trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes a comprehensive set of natural verbatim trigger phrases users would actually say ('find content gaps', 'what am I missing', 'topics to cover', 'content opportunities', 'where are my content blind spots') with multiple synonyms and variations.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear content-gap niche and explicitly disambiguates from adjacent skills ('For broader competitive intelligence, see competitor-analysis. For general keyword discovery, see keyword-research.'), minimizing conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (622 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 27 suspicious	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: teeclaw/phorm-nft
Path: .agents/skills/content-gap-analysis/SKILL.md
Commit: 02adecb

Reviewed: ~8 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.