domain-authority-auditor

Use when the user asks to "audit domain authority", "domain trust score", "CITE audit", "how authoritative is my site", "domain credibility check", "is my domain trustworthy", or "domain credibility score". Runs a full CITE 40-item domain authority audit, scoring domains across 4 dimensions with weighted scoring by domain type. Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, veto checks, and a prioritized action plan. For content-level assessment, see content-quality-auditor. For link profile details, see backlink-analyzer.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and concrete templates, but it is verbose in places and its main progressive-disclosure reference (the 40-item benchmark) is missing from the bundle. Tightening promotional/redundant sections and shipping the referenced benchmark file would lift quality.

Suggestions

Remove the "Browse all 20 skills" promo block and consolidate the three repeated related-skills lists into the single "Related Skills" section to reclaim context tokens.

Add the missing references/cite-domain-rating.md (or inline the 40-item criteria) so the deferred benchmark the body points to is actually present in the bundle.

Drop the inline-duplicated domain-type weight table in favor of a single canonical source to avoid drift between the two copies.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient but padded: the "Browse all 20 skills" promo block, repeated related-skills listings across Related Skills / Recommended Next Steps / Cross-Reference, and an inline-duplicated weight table ("copied for convenience") all add tokens Claude doesn't need.	3 / 5
Actionability	Concrete scoring rubric (Pass=10/Partial=5/Fail=0), exact veto IDs (T03/T05/T09) with cap behavior, full report templates, and a worked example with specific actions (e.g. "Create Wikidata entry ... with P856, P452, P571") make it copy-paste ready.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Four clearly sequenced steps (Preparation → C+I Audit → T+E Audit → Scoring & Report) with an explicit early veto checkpoint ("Score capped at 39") and Input/Output validation checklists provide explicit validation steps and feedback loops.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Good section structure with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (references/cite-domain-rating.md, CONNECTORS.md), but the primary canonical reference file is absent from the bundle while the body defers the 40-item criteria to it — a real, non-trivial navigation gap.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: third-person voice, concrete multi-action capabilities, a rich set of natural trigger phrases, and explicit boundary guidance against sister skills. It clearly answers both what the skill does and when to use it.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Runs a full CITE 40-item domain authority audit, scoring domains across 4 dimensions with weighted scoring by domain type" and "Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, veto checks, and a prioritized action plan" list multiple concrete, comprehensive actions.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both: what ("Runs a full CITE 40-item domain authority audit...") and when ("Use when the user asks to...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"audit domain authority", "domain trust score", "CITE audit", "how authoritative is my site", "domain credibility check", "is my domain trustworthy", "domain credibility score" give comprehensive natural-phrase coverage with synonyms users would actually say.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear CITE domain-authority niche with distinct triggers, and it explicitly differentiates sister skills ("For content-level assessment, see content-quality-auditor. For link profile details, see backlink-analyzer."), minimizing overlap.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 36 suspicious	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 3 missing	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: teeclaw/phorm-nft
Path: .agents/skills/domain-authority-auditor/SKILL.md
Commit: 02adecb

Reviewed: 6 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.