CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

on-page-seo-auditor

Use when the user asks to "audit page SEO", "on-page SEO check", "SEO score", "page optimization", "what SEO issues does this page have", "what is wrong with this page SEO", "score my page", or "why is this page not ranking". Performs comprehensive on-page SEO audits to identify optimization opportunities including title tags, meta descriptions, headers, content quality, internal linking, and image optimization. For server, speed, and crawl issues, see technical-seo-checker. For full EEAT content quality scoring, see content-quality-auditor.

70

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete templates, a worked example, and explicit validation checklists, but it is long and somewhat padded with repetitive template tables and generic tips. Progressive disclosure is good though some reference-grade content remains inline.

Suggestions

Move the 'Industry Benchmark Data' tables and 'Common Issue Resolution Playbook' into a separate reference file, keeping only a brief pointer in SKILL.md to cut tokens.

Remove the 'Tips for Success' section (generic platitudes) and the 'What This Skill Does' list that duplicates the frontmatter description.

Consolidate the eight near-identical criterion-table audit templates into a shared table schema referenced once, rather than repeating the full table per section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly actionable templates rather than concept explanation, but the ~740-line body carries repetitive criterion tables, a 'What This Skill Does' list that duplicates the description, and platitude padding in 'Tips for Success' that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete report templates, an explicit scoring formula with a fully worked numeric example, fix-template tables ('Add: "[Primary Keyword]: [Benefit] | [Brand]"'), and benchmark data — copy-paste ready guidance covering common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

An 11-step numbered sequence is clearly laid out with a dedicated Validation Checkpoints section and per-page-type checklists, but checkpoints are separate checklists rather than integrated error-recovery feedback loops.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A 'Reference Materials' section clearly signals the one-level-deep scoring-rubric.md (a real file), and sections are well organized; however benchmark tables and the issue-resolution playbook are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into references.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: third-person voice, concrete capabilities, exhaustive natural-language triggers, and explicit disambiguation from neighboring skills. It cleanly satisfies every anchor at the top level.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete audit actions — 'title tags, meta descriptions, headers, content quality, internal linking, and image optimization' — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Performs comprehensive on-page SEO audits...') and when ('Use when the user asks to...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes many natural user phrases ('audit page SEO', 'on-page SEO check', 'SEO score', 'score my page', 'why is this page not ranking') covering synonyms and common variations a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche and explicitly redirects overlapping work to sibling skills ('For server, speed, and crawl issues, see technical-seo-checker'; 'For full EEAT content quality scoring, see content-quality-auditor'), minimizing conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (771 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 30 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
teeclaw/phorm-nft
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.