Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body with well-organized sections and executable commands. The only gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints between steps, which would make the workflow more robust.
Suggestions
Add a quick verification after the copy and build steps — e.g., confirm `[ -f .env ]` after copying and that `server/ui/assets/` exists after `pnpm build:server` — to create explicit checkpoints.
Note what to do if `pnpm build:server` fails (e.g., run `pnpm install` first) so there is a light feedback loop for the riskiest step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: short Purpose, three numbered steps with copy-paste commands, and a compact 'Why' table — every section earns its place and no tokens explain concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`git worktree list`, the `MAIN=...; cp $MAIN/.env ./.env` block, `pnpm build:server`) with concrete specifics like the build path, matching the 'fully executable' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced and a success signal is given ("pnpm dev should now start without errors"), but there is no validation/checkpoint to confirm each step succeeded (e.g., verifying .env was copied or that assets were built), so checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; it is well-organized into Purpose, Steps, and a Why table, which per the simple-skills note earns a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |