Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable, well-structured skill body for a simple single-purpose task — the commands are copy-paste ready and the rationale table adds genuinely non-obvious repo knowledge. The main defects are the missing step for the bin/ Temporal CLI the Purpose promises to fix, only implicit final validation, and small duplication between the Purpose section and the Why table.
Suggestions
Add a step to copy the Temporal CLI binary from the main worktree (e.g. cp -r $MAIN/bin/ ./bin/) so the steps cover everything the Purpose section says is missing — otherwise "pnpm dev works without errors" may not hold.
Make the final checkpoint explicit instead of implicit: run `pnpm dev` (or the server start) and confirm it boots, with a note on what to check if it fails.
Trim the duplication between the Purpose section and the "Why each step is needed" table — the gitignored-files-missing rationale is stated in both places.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no git/worktree concept explanations, mostly executable commands plus a compact rationale table. Minor over-explanation could be trimmed: the "gitignored files missing" rationale and the "pnpm dev" outcome each appear in both the Purpose section and the Why table, so it sits just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are copy-paste ready ("git worktree list", "MAIN=$(git worktree list | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')" + "cp $MAIN/.env ./.env", "pnpm build:server"). The gap: the Purpose and description call out the missing Temporal CLI in bin/, yet no step copies it — only .env is handled — leaving a minor hole in otherwise fully executable guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, correctly ordered 1-2-3 sequence with a stated end state ("pnpm dev should now start without errors"). Validation is implicit rather than an explicit verify command, and there is no error-recovery guidance, so it matches "clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps" rather than the explicit-feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references and no bundle files; the Purpose / Steps / Why-each-step-is-needed sections are well organized. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections alone merit a 5 here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |