Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-executed orchestration skill body: every job carries concrete commands, ordered steps with explicit stop conditions, and error-recovery guidance, while profile detail is correctly pushed to a real, well-signaled reference file. The single weakness is mild verbosity — a handful of justifying sentences (the "most common misunderstanding" rationale, the UI walkthrough of the Code reviews page) could be cut without losing actionability. No validation gaps exist because the workflows involve no destructive or batch operations.
Suggestions
Trim the rationale sentences that justify instructions rather than state them, e.g. "It is the most common misunderstanding, and a user who stops at the App install sees no reviews and concludes the product is broken" can become "State this explicitly every time; users who stop at the App install see no reviews."
Condense the UI walkthrough of the Code reviews page ("Until an installation exists, that page offers Connect GitHub. Once one does, it lists the repositories...") to the two facts Claude needs: the page is where enabling happens and where the App's reachable repositories are listed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with product-specific facts Claude cannot know (link construction, flag semantics, "Count findings only when `status` is `ok`") and explains no general concepts, but a few rationale sentences could be trimmed, e.g. "It is the most common misunderstanding, and a user who stops at the App install sees no reviews and concludes the product is broken" and the UI-description of the Code reviews page. This fits the 4 anchor (efficient, minor over-explanation) rather than 5, since not quite every token earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready throughout: `tessl org list --json`, the URL template `https://tessl.io/orgs/<id>/code-reviews`, `tessl code review --base origin/main --head HEAD`, `tessl code review --skill tessl/code-review#review-security-and-privacy`, and per-platform openers (`open`, `xdg-open`, `start`). Commands cover the common cases exactly as the 5 anchor requires; 4 would imply gaps in the executable detail, and none are present. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are explicit with checkpoints and error recovery: "Then do three things, in order" ending in a hard "**Stop.**" with what-not-to-do guardrails, "If the command fails, say the page could not be opened", "ask which one to set up rather than guessing", a tie-break rule ("an install before a lens... a respond before anything else"), and the `--json` status check. This matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops; 4 would require missing checkpoints, and the routing, install, and run flows each have theirs. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized hub (job table with signals, per-job sections, "What not to do") and defers exactly the right material one level deep: repository-profile schema details live in references/repository-profile.md (verified to exist, 193 lines), referenced at both points where a profile would be written ("Read [references/repository-profile.md]... before writing it"). No content that belongs in a reference is inlined and no reference is buried, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |