Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent instructional content: fully actionable templates, an explicit self-review validation loop, and a clear process order, all with minimal padding. The only refinement opportunities are trimming a few rationale sentences and considering whether the large always-needed templates justify the skill's inline length.
Suggestions
Trim explanatory rationale (e.g., the 'You reason best about code you can hold in context at once' sentences in File Structure) to pure directives — the guidance stands without the justification.
Consider moving the Plan Document Header and Task Structure templates into a references/ file (e.g., references/plan-template.md) to keep SKILL.md a lean overview, since the templates are reproduced verbatim each run.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with no teaching of known concepts ("DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits."), and templates carry real content. A 4 rather than 5 because a few rationale sentences ("You reason best about code you can hold in context at once, and your edits are more reliable when files are focused") and the extended placeholder list could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Everything is executable: exact save path (docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md), copy-ready plan-header and task templates with concrete test/commit commands (pytest … -v, git commit -m), and a hard placeholder blacklist. Guidance is copy-paste ready and covers the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The lifecycle is clearly sequenced (Scope Check → File Structure → task right-sizing → templates → Self-Review → Execution Handoff) with an explicit validation checklist (spec coverage, placeholder scan, type consistency) and a fix-loop ("If you find issues, fix them inline… If you find a spec requirement with no task, add the task"). Matches the top anchor's checklist-plus-feedback-loop pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) with well-organized sections and no nested references; the templates are needed on every invocation so inlining is defensible. A 4 rather than 5 because the two large template blocks (Plan Document Header, Task Structure) could arguably live in a reference file, and the skill is over the ~50-line threshold where section organization alone would justify a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |