Conciseness

The body is largely lean — no basic BDD/Gherkin primers, concrete templates throughout — but the Overview's proliferation bullets partially duplicate "When to use", and the ~30-line Worked example re-narrates Steps 1-5 with only modest new information. Matches the 4 anchor (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed); not 3 because there is no concept explanation Claude already lacks.

Actionability

Decision rules are concrete (normalize by "lowercase, drop articles, collapse parameters"; group by normalized form; DUPLICATE/PARTIAL/GAP classification) and executable commands live in the real, clearly-signaled references files. Matches the 4 anchor (mostly executable, minor gaps) — e.g., how to compute "highest count of usage in current Gherkin" for canonical-step selection and the pre-merge gate mechanics are only pointed at, not specified.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-6 are explicitly ordered up front ("inventory -> detect duplicates -> recommend consolidations -> reorganize and publish the README -> gate new steps pre-merge -> repeat"), and the destructive consolidation step carries an explicit validation feedback loop: "run the full BDD suite and assert zero undefined or ambiguous steps... If a scenario reports an undefined step... fix that reference and re-run." Matches the 5 anchor including error recovery.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview with both executable details (per-runner extraction commands, overlap script, CI gate) correctly split into two real, substantive reference files that are one level deep (no nested references), each linked with a description of what it contains and summarized again in a References section. Matches the 5 anchor for well-signaled, one-level-deep references.

Specificity

The description lists four concrete, verbatim actions — "Inventories steps, merges duplicates, publishes a step-library README and a scenario coverage map" — covering the full curation cycle, matching the 5-anchor pattern of multiple specific actions with comprehensive coverage. Not 4 because the named verbs span the skill's entire workflow (inventory, dedup, publish, coverage) rather than leaving minor gaps.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: "Use when a Cucumber, Behave or Reqnroll project has grown past ~50 step definitions, before writing a step that may already exist, or when new .feature files need a duplicate check" gives three concrete when-triggers, and the inventory/merge/publish verbs give a clear what. Matches the 5 anchor with concrete trigger phrases; the 4 anchor's 'when could be more explicit' does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural terms a user would say — "Cucumber", "Behave", "Reqnroll", "step definitions", ".feature files", "duplicate" — including the file extension, matching the 4-anchor (good coverage, a few natural terms missing). Not 5 because common synonyms like "BDD", "Gherkin", and "SpecFlow" are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (BDD step-library curation) with distinct triggers keyed to runner names and step definitions, unlikely to fire for general testing or Gherkin-writing skills. Not 4 because the described triggers (duplicate step definitions, .feature duplicate checks) are owned by this skill alone.