CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

about-page

Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.

48

Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/about-page/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

47%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured and leans appropriately on a real references/rule.md file for detail, keeping the SKILL.md body lean. However, the body offers mostly abstract direction with no executable verification commands and no explicit validation workflow, which undermines actionability and workflow clarity for an auditing skill whose own description emphasizes verifying rendered output.

Suggestions

Add one or two concrete, executable verification commands in the 'Check' or 'Code Review' section (e.g., a curl command to fetch the rendered /about route and inspect headers/status) to lift actionability.

Insert an explicit sequenced workflow with a validation checkpoint (e.g., 1. fetch rendered /about, 2. confirm 200 + relevant headers/structured data, 3. flag violations, 4. fix and re-verify) so workflow clarity clears the destructive/batch cap.

Trim the 'Explain' and 'Code Review' paragraphs to one-line directives since the detailed rationale already lives in references/rule.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is short and sectioned (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) with little padding, though the Explain and Code Review sections restate intent a user could infer, so it is efficient with minor trims possible.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is mostly abstract instruction ('Create a new page at /about and add detailed information', 'Review metadata generation, rendered HTML, structured data') with no executable commands or concrete verification steps in the body itself.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sections imply a rough Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review flow but there is no explicit sequence, no validation checkpoint, and no feedback loop for verifying rendered output despite the description stressing verification.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md') which exists as a real file, with the bulk of detail appropriately deferred; only minor organization gaps remain.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description provides an explicit 'Use when' trigger and names a recognizable SEO domain, but embeds the rule title awkwardly and offers only modestly specific actions with overlapping SEO vocabulary. It is functional but reads more like a checklist-derived sentence than a polished, distinctive trigger description.

Suggestions

Rewrite the embedded phrase 'related to Create a dedicated About page' into natural language (e.g., '...indexability of the site's About page') so it reads as a trigger a user would actually say.

Add concrete verification actions as trigger terms a user would voice (e.g., 'audit About-page markup', 'check rendered About-page HTML') to lift specificity and trigger-term quality.

Tighten the what/when pairing so the capability statement leads with the action (third person) before the 'Use when' clause.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a domain (auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, indexability) and a couple concrete actions ("Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response"), but the actions are narrow and not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicit "Use when ..." clause answers when, and the what (auditing metadata/crawlability/etc. related to an About page, verifying rendered HTML and HTTP response) is present; the what could be more sharply stated but both are answered.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant keywords ("metadata", "crawlability", "structured data", "indexability") but missing common natural variations a user would say and the phrase "Create a dedicated About page" is awkwardly embedded rather than a clean trigger term.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to About-page indexability which gives some niche, but the generic SEO auditing terms (metadata, crawlability, structured data) overlap with broader SEO skills, leaving moderate conflict risk.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.