Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized review-checklist skill that defers detail to a single existing reference file with clear navigation. It is concise and well-disclosed; the only gap is the absence of inline verification checkpoints in the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned body with no padding or basic-concept explanation; every line (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete checks ('every element with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" has an accessible name') and concrete fixes ('aria-labelledby pointing to the header or aria-label'); executable examples are deferred to the reference rather than inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check→Fix→Explain→Code Review sections form a clear review sequence, but the body lacks explicit verification checkpoints (those live in references/rule.md), keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview body with a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer ('see references/rule.md') to an existing reference file that holds the detail; easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |