Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, appropriately brief overview that correctly delegates code examples and detail to a real, clearly signaled reference file. The body itself would score higher with less redundant boilerplate (intro and Quick Reference restate the same point) and an explicit post-fix verification step.
Suggestions
Trim the redundant content: the Quick Reference bullets and intro sentence restate the Check/Fix guidance and basic accessibility knowledge Claude already has.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after the Fix step (e.g. 'Re-run the accessibility check to confirm the dialog now exposes the name') instead of only mentioning verification in passing.
Clean up templated phrasing like 'interactive states that affect Ensure dialogs have an accessible name' into natural instructions, and drop the duplicated rule URL footer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short but includes unnecessary explanation Claude already knows ('When a dialog opens, screen readers should announce its purpose immediately...') and the Quick Reference bullets ('Helps users understand the context and purpose of the modal') largely duplicate the Check and Fix sections. Mostly efficient but could be tightened — anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: 'Verify that every element with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" has an accessible name' and 'Provide an accessible name for the dialog using aria-labelledby (pointing to the header) or aria-label'. As an instruction-only skill the absence of inline code is acceptable and details are appropriately deferred to references/rule.md, but no inline example or named verification tooling leaves minor gaps — 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sections give a present sequence, but validation is only implicit ('note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech') rather than an explicit checkpoint or re-check step after fixing. Steps listed with validation gaps — anchor 3, not 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md' — and references/rule.md exists with exactly that content (code examples, rationale, exceptions). Clear overview, well-signaled single reference, easy navigation: anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |