Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized checklist for a simple single-purpose rule: concrete detection criteria, the exact fix mechanism, and a clean hand-off to a verified one-level-deep reference holding the full code examples. Only a small redundancy between the intro and Explain sections keeps it from full marks on conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, checklist-style sections with no tutorials on concepts Claude already knows; only minor trimmable redundancy — the intro line 'Blind users miss critical plot points...' duplicates the Explain section's content. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names the exact mechanism ('Use track element with kind=descriptions'), concrete detection criteria (actions, expressions, scene changes, on-screen text), and fallback options (extended version, narration integration), with full code appropriately delegated to references/rule.md. Per the instruction-skill note, missing inline code is not penalized since the guidance is actionable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose skill with an unambiguous Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review sequence; verification is explicitly addressed ('note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech'), and no destructive or batch operations apply the validation cap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md') that exists in the bundle and contains the full code examples. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |