Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured with appropriate progressive disclosure to a real reference file, but the body leans on prose guidance rather than executable examples and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in its review workflow.
Suggestions
Add a small executable markup snippet (the <track kind='descriptions'> element) directly in the Fix section so the core action is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.
Insert an explicit validation step in the Check/Fix flow, e.g. 'Verify the descriptions track appears in player controls and does not overlap dialogue' as a checkpoint before closing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: 'Identify videos where visual content conveys information not available in the audio track... Verify audio descriptions are available' with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It points to a concrete track element with kind='descriptions' and the extended-version alternative, but the body itself contains no executable code or complete examples—those are deferred to references/rule.md. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sequence gives a reasonable flow, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or verify-then-proceed feedback loops for what is effectively a review-then-fix task. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a concise overview with clear section headings and a well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and the referenced file exists, giving clean single-level navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |