Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, well-structured audit skill that uses progressive disclosure effectively, offloading detail to references/rule.md. The body's guidance is concrete but light on executable verification steps, which are deferred to the reference.
Suggestions
Add one or two executable verification snippets to the body (e.g. a curl/selector to confirm the byline renders in the DOM and is not client-injected after crawl), so the core check does not require opening the reference.
Include an explicit post-fix validation step in the workflow (e.g. 'Re-crawl the URL and confirm the byline is present in the rendered HTML before closing').
Trim the E-E-A-T explanatory opening sentence to assume Claude's familiarity and tighten the intro.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and sectioned, with only mild over-explanation in the E-E-A-T intro sentence that Claude could be assumed to know. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Fix section gives a concrete instruction ('Add an author section... name, role, and a link to their profile') but the body lacks executable verification commands or selectors, delegating those to references/rule.md. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review structure gives a clear simple-skill workflow, but there is no explicit post-fix validation checkpoint, leaving a minor gap below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized overview in SKILL.md with a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to references/rule.md (a real bundle file), making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |