Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a real, clearly signaled reference file. Its weakness is actionability and workflow clarity: the body gives abstract direction without executable examples or explicit verification checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add one small inline code snippet (e.g. a before/after <video autoplay muted> markup fix) so the body is actionable without requiring the reference.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint to the workflow, e.g. 'After fixing, reload the page and confirm no audio plays and pause controls are reachable within the first few tab stops'.
Tighten the Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections to remove restated guidance and keep each section's content distinct.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean overview with short Quick Reference bullets and brief sections rather than a wall of text; it stays just above a 5 because the Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections partly restate the same autoplay guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is directive but largely abstract ('Flag exact elements...', 'Remove autoplay attributes', 'provide prominent, keyboard-accessible pause controls') with no executable code or selectors in the body; concrete examples are deferred to the reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review imply a sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops describing how to confirm the fix worked; the skill is not batch/destructive so the destructive cap does not apply. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), which is a real bundle file, and splits detailed implementation out appropriately. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |