Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable overview for a simple single-purpose rule: concrete domain examples, a real verification step (uBlock Origin), and clean offloading of implementation detail to a verified one-level reference. Remaining gaps are minor — the 'Explain' section could be dropped or trimmed, and the test/verification step could be an explicit numbered checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized (Quick Reference bullets, short Check/Fix sections), but minor trimming is possible: the 'Explain' section largely restates what Claude can already infer from the Check/Fix content, and the opening sentence duplicates the 'Why It Matters' material in references/rule.md. That matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance throughout: named domains to look for ('googletagmanager.com, hotjar.com, facebook.net, doubleclick.net'), a concrete test ('Test whether these resources load successfully with uBlock Origin enabled'), and concrete fixes ('Self-host critical external scripts on your own domain', 'Use a reverse proxy or server-side route'). It is not 5 because the test step lacks an exact command/procedure and the 'Code Review' section stays at the level of direction ('Flag exact responses, cookies, or browser behaviors') without specifics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear implicit sequence — identify URLs (Check), test with uBlock Origin (validation checkpoint), then remediate (Fix) — with the validation step present but embedded in prose rather than called out. It is not 5 because there is no explicit ordered workflow or feedback loop (what to do if the test still fails after proxying), and the 'Code Review' section's 'verify them against the effective production-like response' lacks a concrete checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-organized sections and a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md' — and that file exists and delivers exactly the promised detail (filter syntax examples, blocked-domain table). This matches the top anchor for clear overview with well-signaled one-level references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |